Moved programming docs

docs/professional/software-development-practices/code-review.md

@@ -1,5 +1,21 @@
 # Code review practices
 
+## Who should review?
+
+Code should be reviewed by senior developers who understand the system being
+changed.
+
+Code can also be reviewed by more junior developers, as they can learn about the
+system by comprehending the changeset, and they can spot some mistakes or
+problems. However these reviewers should not be able to approve pull requests.
+
+## What should be reviewed?
+
+- The change should make sense to the reviewer.
+- The code should meet the team's standards for maintainability.
+- The changeset should be limited to the problem being solved by the pull
+  request.
+
 ## Write actionable comments
 
 [Conventional comments](https://conventionalcomments.org/)

docs/professional/software-development-practices/working-on-a-team.md

@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
 # What I've learned from working on a team.
 
-A cordial working environment is more important than getting everything your
-way, or optimal engineering practices. You have to pick your battles and focus
-on fixing just the things that you can't work with at all.
+A cordial working environment is more important than getting everything your way
+
+If devs don't like working with each other then the team's productivity will
+collapse. It helps to maintain a collegial working atmosphere, where devs feel
+valued and petty politics are kept to a minimum.
+
+You have to pick your battles and focus on fixing just the things that you can't
+work with at all.
 
 Some devs are mediocre programmers. Some devs are mediocre communicators. Some
 are both.